
Other ways to look at mechanized labor is whether or not the innovation or advancement is worth it. The article points out that innovations, like the light bulb, help way more than it hinders. The counterpoint would be automated check out stands at supermarkets, which could be replacing jobs without providing a meaningful sense of productivity. The overall issue that the article tackles is that those individuals without a college degree who are relegated to lower skill jobs will eventually be replaced. The concern is valid, but the solution would be to implement systems that aid said workers in finding jobs that require more skill.
The future is AI robots capable of handling workloads that no human could ever accomplish. Whether I believe MIT's reassurance of that not being the case remains to be seen, especially when those in control of the technology may not have the interests of "the little people" in mind.
Thank you for reading.
The MIT Report
No comments:
Post a Comment